Cases 91 - 100 of 32,354
Monzon v. Rogers et al
as 1:2024cv00370
Plaintiff:
Roman Sebastian Monzon
Defendant:
L Rogers, Shenica Royster, Erick Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Smith v. Corbin et al
as 7:2024cv00293
Plaintiff:
Timothy Wayne Smith
Defendant:
Superintendent Clay Corbin, Captain H. Custer, A. Kovak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanchez v. Church
as 7:2024cv00178
Plaintiff:
Randy Sanchez, Jr.
Defendant:
Mrs. Church
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Patterson v. Youngkin et al
as 3:2024cv00186
Plaintiff:
Larry Edwin Patterson
Defendant:
Glenn Youngkin, Terrance C. Coles, Patricia West and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hatcher v. Pocahontas State Correctional Center Investigations Unit
as 7:2024cv00181
Plaintiff:
Quashawn Akeem Hatcher
Defendant:
Pocahontas State Correctional Center Investigations Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Puller v. Dotson
as 7:2024cv00187
Plaintiff:
Toccara Puller
Defendant:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holloway v. Dotson
as 3:2024cv00164
Plaintiff:
Tyrone L. Holloway
Defendant:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pomenta v. Corbin et al
as 7:2024cv00199
Plaintiff:
Richard Anthony Pomenta
Defendant:
Clay Corbin, Captain M.W. Parker, Sgt. Pettit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Springer v. Virginia Department of Corrections et al
as 7:2024cv00193
Plaintiff:
Levi G. Springer
Defendant:
Virginia Department of Corrections, Chadwick Dotson, Director of Medical Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Duffield Facility S.W.V.R.J.A. et al
as 7:2024cv00197
Plaintiff:
Samuel Smith
Defendant:
Duffield Facility S.W.V.R.J.A., Pharmacy Nurse R. Carter and 6.6955
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
