Cases 101 - 110 of 3,138
United States of America v. The Real Property And Premises Known As 432 North Oakhurst Drive, Condominium Unit 103, Beverly Hills, California 90210, And All Proceeds Traceable Thereto et al
as 1:2022cv07410
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
The Real Property And Premises Known As 432 North Oakhurst Drive, Condominium Unit 103, Beverly Hills, California 90210, And All Proceeds Traceable Thereto, The Real Property And Premises Known As 432 North Oakhurst Drive, Condominium Unit 203, Beverly Hills, California 90210, And All Proceeds Traceable Thereto, Any And All Funds On Deposit In Stifel Nicolaus & Co. Account Number Ending In 9142, Held In The Name Of 7D Business Bureau Inc., And All Proceeds Traceable Thereto and others
Claimant:
73DT Business Enterprises, LLC, 7D Business Bureau, Inc. and Yosef Manela
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
United States of America v. $2,337,674.62 Seized from Metropolitan Commercial Bank Account 0199010765 held in the name of Delacroix Investment Fund
as 1:2022cv10223
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$2,337,674.62 Seized from Metropolitan Commercial Bank Account 0199010765 held in the name of Delacroix Investment Fund
Claimant:
Delacroix Investment Fund, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981 Civil Forfeiture
United States of America v. $5,379,876.94 in United States Currency Formerly on Deposit in Sunflower Bank, N.A. Account 1101996560, Held in the name of OFAC Blocked Account MALOFEYEV
as 1:2022cv10148
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$5,379,876.94 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY FORMERLY ON DEPOSIT IN SUNFLOWER BANK, N.A. ACCOUNT 1101996560, HELD IN THE NAME OF OFAC BLOCKED ACCOUNT MALOFEYEV
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981 Civil Forfeiture
USA v. Parcel of Property Located at 24 Decicco Road, Waterbury, Connecticut et al
as 3:2022cv01508
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Parcel of Property Located at 24 Decicco Road, Waterbury, Connecticut
Claimant:
Zhiquan Zhao
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States of America v. $530,838.57 UNITED STATES CURRENCY SEIZED FROM JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. TOTAL BUSINESS CHECKING ACCOUNT ENDING IN 1033, HELD IN THE NAME OF ALLURE TECHNICAL SERVICE, INC.
as 1:2022cv00884
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$530,838.57 UNITED STATES CURRENCY SEIZED FROM JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. TOTAL BUSINESS CHECKING ACCOUNT ENDING IN 1033, HELD IN THE NAME OF ALLURE TECHNICAL SERVICE, INC.
Claimant:
Nina Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341 Complaint for Forfeiture
United States of America, U.S. Department of Justice et al
as 1:2022cv06725
Plaintiff:
United States of America, U.S. Department of Justice and CAPRICORN GOODS WHOLESALERS LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 3114 Motion for Return of Seized Property
CAMARO IMPEX GENERAL TRADING LLC v. United States of America, U.S. Department of Justice
as 1:2022cv06726
Plaintiff:
CAMARO IMPEX GENERAL TRADING LLC
Defendant:
United States of America, U.S. Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 3114 Motion for Return of Seized Property
Castaneda v. United States of America, U.S. Department of Justice
as 1:2022cv06723
Plaintiff:
Rebecca L Castaneda
Defendant:
United States of America, U.S. Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 3114 Motion for Return of Seized Property
PERFECT FRAME, LLC v. United States of America, U.S. Department of Justice
as 1:2022cv06750
Plaintiff:
PERFECT FRAME, LLC
Defendant:
United States of America, U.S. Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1355 Petition for Return of Property
United States of America v. $122,507.00 in United States Currency et al
as 1:2022cv09279
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$122,507.00 in United States Currency and $233,286.00 in United States Currency
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981 Civil Forfeiture
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
