Cases 101 - 110 of 357
Battle v. Waycross Division et al
as 5:2016cv00004
Plaintiff:
Antonio Battle
Defendant:
Waycross Division, Coffee Correctional Facility, Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Battle v. Office of the Circuit Public Defender et al
as 1:2015cv04400
Plaintiff:
Antonio Battle
Defendant:
Office of the Circuit Public Defender, Bureau of Prisons and United of States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Appolon v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 3:2015cv00105
Plaintiff:
Ernst Appolon
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rave-Estrada v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 3:2015cv00104
Plaintiff:
Juan C. Rave-Estrada
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Battle v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2015cv04184
Plaintiff:
Antonio Battle
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, Latin America, United States and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Battle v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2015cv04001
Plaintiff:
Antonio Battle
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons and Crime (Bosses)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Battle v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2015cv03989
Plaintiff:
Antonio Battle
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, Coffee Correctional Facility Officer, Business Offices Worker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Battle v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2015cv03991
Plaintiff:
Antonio Battle
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Battle v. Bureau of Prison et al
as 1:2015cv03990
Plaintiff:
Antonio Battle
Defendant:
Bureau of Prison and Clayton Counts C.S.I.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lamour v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2015cv00084
Petitioner:
Rodelyn Lamour
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons, Charles Samuels, D. Ray James Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
