Cases 101 - 110 of 6,396
Cabello v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2023cv16862
Plaintiff:
Juan Cabello
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Hector L Briseno and Cara M McSparron
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Benitez v. Bogucki et al
as 1:2023cv16896
Plaintiff:
Francisco Benitez
Defendant:
Jerome Bogucki, Raymond Schalk, Paul Zacharias and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bey v. Clark, II et al
as 1:2023cv16854
Plaintiff:
Joseph Bey
Defendant:
Donald Clark, II, Patricia Sheridan, Marchand Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv16836
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Colon v. Noradin et al
as 1:2023cv16798
Plaintiff:
Edgardo Colon
Defendant:
Anthony F. Noradin, Samuel J. Cirone, William Brogan and others
Petitioner:
Tyrone Clay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clay v. Noradin, et al
as 1:2023cv16799
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Clay
Defendant:
Anthony F. Noradin, Samuel J. Cirone, William Brogan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Keating v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2023cv16793
Plaintiff:
Joseph F. Keating
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Officer Migdalia Bulnes, Jenny Christoforakis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Saldana v. Erby et al
as 1:2023cv16569
Plaintiff:
Elba SALDANA
Defendant:
Herbert Erby and BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jackson v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2023cv16589
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Jackson
Defendant:
City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. Kimble et al
as 1:2023cv16434
Plaintiff:
Jamar Rogers
Defendant:
Ronald Kimble, The City of Chicago and City of Chicago, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
