Cases
Cases 101 - 110 of 384
-SH Deandre Maurice Howard v. Derral G Adams We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2007cv02680
Respondent: Derral G Adams
Petitioner: Deandre Maurice Howard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Salvador Renteria v. Derral Adam We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-15367
Petitioner - Appellant: SALVADOR M. RENTERIA
Respondent - Appellee: DERRAL G. ADAMS
Leonard McSherry v. Derral Adam
as 11-55194
Petitioner - Appellant: LEONARD JAMES MCSHERRY
Respondent - Appellee: DERRAL G. ADAMS, Warden
Vincent Bruce v. Jeanne Woodford, et al
as 11-15195
Plaintiff - Appellant: VINCENT C. BRUCE
Defendant - Appellee: JEANNE WOODFORD, DERRAL G. ADAMS, LYDIA HENSE and others
Jeffrey Perrotte v. Derral Adam
as 11-55098
Petitioner - Appellant: JEFFREY P. PERROTTE
Respondent - Appellee: DERRAL G. ADAMS, Warden
Durrell Puckett v. Derral Adams, et al
as 11-55029
Petitioner - Appellant: DURRELL PUCKETT, AKA Durrell Anthony Puckett
Respondent - Appellee: DERRAL G. ADAMS, Warden of Corcoran State Prison and CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION
Jose Vasquez v. Derral Adam
as 11-55008
Petitioner - Appellant: JOSE A. VASQUEZ
Respondent - Appellee: DERRAL G. ADAMS, Warden
David Vance v. R. Wong, et al
as 10-57069
Petitioner - Appellant: DAVID A. VANCE
Respondent - Appellee: R. WONG, Warden and DERRAL G. ADAMS
Cortez v. Adams et al
as 5:2010cv05918
Plaintiff: Juan Jose Cortez
Defendant: Derral G. Adams and Santa Clara County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Edward Portillo v. USDC-CALA
as 10-73911
: In re: EDWARD PORTILLO
Petitioner: EDWARD PORTILLO
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Real Party In Interest: SUSAN HUBBARD, Director of Adult California Department of Correction and Rehabilitation, DERRAL G. ADAMS, Warden and RICHARD SUBIA, Director CDCR

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?