Cases 101 - 110 of 130
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2008cv00255
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2008cv00234
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2008cv00248
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2008cv00233
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Taylor v. Mississippi State Of et al
as 3:2008cv00274
Plaintiff:
Roderick K. Taylor
Defendant:
Mississippi State Of, Mississippi Department of Corrections and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Banks v. Reese et al
as 5:2007cv00117
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Constance Reese and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Champion v. Reece et al
as 5:2007cv00119
Plaintiff:
Gregory Champion
Defendant:
Constance Reece, Charles Smith, Raymond E. Holt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Champion v. Reece et al
as 5:2007cv00118
Plaintiff:
Arthur Champion
Defendant:
Constance Reece, Charles Smith, Raymond E. Holt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Alvarez v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2007cv00107
Plaintiff:
Henry Cuevas Alvarez
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Constance Reese, Anthony Chambers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Reece et al
as 5:2007cv00085
Plaintiff:
Derrick Martin
Defendant:
Constance Reece, Charles L. Smith, Raymond E. Holt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
