Cases 101 - 110 of 1,084
TATE v. PEOPLE'S UNITED FINANCIAL, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv02030
Defendant:
PEOPLE'S UNITED FINANCIAL, INC., JERRY FRANKLIN, JANE CHWICK and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN TATE
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Lee v. Oberlander et al
as 3:2021cv00665
Respondent:
Derek Oberlander, Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office and Franklin County District Attorney
Petitioner:
Donovon Neal Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bey v. Bechtold et al
as 1:2021cv00607
Petitioner:
David F. Kelly Bey
Respondent:
William Bechtold, Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office and Franklin County District Attorney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
CICCOTELLI v. FIVE PRIME THERAPEUTICS, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv01512
Defendant:
FRANKLIN ACQUISITION SUB, INC., GARRY NICHOLSON, PEDER K JENSEN and others
Plaintiff:
ALEX CICCOTELLI
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Franklin University v. CGFNS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
as 2:2021cv01304
Plaintiff:
Franklin University
Defendant:
CGFNS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1182
CICCOTELLI v. TCF FINANCIAL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2021cv01205
Defendant:
DAVID T PROVOST, ARTHUR A WEISS, VANCE K OPPERMAN and others
Plaintiff:
ALEX CICCOTELLI
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Smith v. Sherman et al
as 1:2021cv00438
Defendant:
Rickey Sherman, Franklin Correctional Facility and SCI-Houtzdale
Plaintiff:
James Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FRANKLIN v. LUITPOLD PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv00948
Defendant:
DAIICHI SANKYO US HOLDINGS, INC., VIFOR (INTERNATIONAL) AG, DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
CANDY FRANKLIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00864
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
WALLACE v. TICE et al
as 1:2021cv00340
Respondent:
The Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania, Warden Eric Tice and Franklin County District Attorney
Petitioner:
Marcus L. Wallace
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
