Cases 101 - 110 of 716
Flack v. Streeval
as 7:2022cv00634
Petitioner:
Gregory W. Flack
Respondent:
BOP Warden J.C. Streeval
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Allen v. Edmonds et al
as 7:2022cv00496
Plaintiff:
Gregory Allen
Defendant:
Larry T. Edmonds and D. Bland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kegley v. Ferguson et al
as 7:2022cv00427
Plaintiff:
Jason Dennis Kegley
Defendant:
Lisa Ferguson, Gregory P. Winston, Officer Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burnette v. Miller et al
as 7:2022cv00417
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Lee Burnette
Defendant:
Lt. Miller, Lt. Hall, Major O'Dell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Petersburg Circuit Court et al
as 2:2022cv00356
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Petersburg Circuit Court, Martin Bryant, Sean Vancampen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hammer v. Hammer
as 1:2022cv00863
Plaintiff:
Gregory Leon Hammer
Defendant:
Morgan Elizabeth Hammer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Bendolph v. DLH Holdings Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv00401
Plaintiff:
Gregory Bendolph
Defendant:
DLH Holdings Corporation and Irving Burton Associates, LLC
Globus Medical Inc. v. Jamison et al
as 2:2022cv00282
Plaintiff:
Globus Medical Inc.
Defendant:
Shane Jamison, Mike Ruane, Mike Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Bracy v. Tully, et al
as 1:2022cv00827
Plaintiff:
Brian Michael Bracy
Defendant:
J. V. Tully, Gregory McRae and SSGT Dallack
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scharf et al v. Pellegrino et al
as 1:2022cv00666
Plaintiff:
Abigail Scharf, Elizabeth Scharf, Abigail Farren and others
Defendant:
Kristiane Pellegrino, Deloitte & Touche, LLP and Deloitte LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
