Cases 101 - 110 of 315
AGARWAL et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2018cv03125
Defendant:
MCCALLA RAYMER LEIBERT PIERCE, LLC, JACQUELINE L. RUSSELL, ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF NEW JERSEY and others
Plaintiff:
ANIL AGARWAL, MADHU AGARWAL and RISHI RAKSHPAL
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
BOTTORFF et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2018cv03122
Plaintiff:
Jae Moon, William Renfroe, Bernard Grosswiler and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Lead Plaintiff:
David bottorff and DANIEL BOTTORFF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LEWIS et al v. AZAR
as 1:2018cv02929
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS B SARGENT, CAROL A LEWIS, CAROL A. LEWIS and others
Defendant:
ALEX AZAR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv02930
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
LEWIS-BUTLER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2018cv02433
Plaintiff:
MAGGIE LEWIS-BUTLER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
HUNT v. MILLER et al
as 1:2018cv02341
Defendant:
ALICE P. MILLER, DIONNA M. LEWIS, MICHAEL D. GILL and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM E. HUNT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BRODY v. PUBLIC STORAGE et al
as 1:2018cv01623
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD L. BRODY
Defendant:
CLINTON MARKWELL, JOSEPH D. RUSSELL, LILY Y. HUGHES and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
LEWIS v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2018cv01643
Defendant:
MARK S. INCH, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and ACTING DIRECTOR OF BOP
Plaintiff:
KENNETH WAYNE LEWIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01642
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
LEWIS v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2018cv01611
Plaintiff:
KENNETH WAYNE LEWIS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and JEFFERSON SESSIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
