Cases 101 - 110 of 1,130
Harris v. Lilley et al
as 1:2022cv02248
Plaintiff:
Eric Harris
Defendant:
Lynn J. Lilley, Cheryl V. Morris, Lynn M. McKeon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Whitfield v. Cedar Realty Trust, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv02204
Plaintiff:
Matthew Whitfield
Defendant:
Cedar Realty Trust, Inc., Bruce J. Schanzer, Gregg A. Gonsalves and others
Rodriguez v. Target Corporation
as 1:2022cv02982
Plaintiff:
Michael D Braun, Jose Rodriguez and Sherri Morris
Defendant:
Target Corporation and Lang Pharma Nutrition, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bw Diversity -Breach of Warranty
Wang v. Cedar Realty Trust, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv01975
Plaintiff:
Elaine Wang
Defendant:
Cedar Realty Trust, Inc., Bruce J. Schanzer, Gregg A. Gonsalves and others
Stein v. Cedar Realty Trust, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv01944
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
Defendant:
Cedar Realty Trust, Inc., Bruce J. Schanzer, Gregg A. Gonsalves and others
Stein v. Cedar Realty Trust, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01944
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
Defendant:
Cedar Realty Trust, Inc., Bruce J. Schanzer, Gregg A. Gonsalves and others
Lau et al v. ZTE Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv01855
Plaintiff:
Christopher J. Rosebrock, Christopher Jason Rozanski, David William Haalili Lau and others
Defendant:
ZTE Corporation, ZTE (USA) Inc., ZTE (TX) Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Abdelaal v. Morris et al
as 1:2022cv01457
Plaintiff:
Ashraf Abdelaal
Defendant:
David Morris and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Davis et al v. T&T Express Shipping, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv01936
Plaintiff:
Dawain Davis, Luke Lapomp and Joshua Morris
Defendant:
T&T Express Shipping, LLC and Dale Miller
Friedman v. Friedman et al
as 1:2022cv00978
Plaintiff:
Robert Friedman
Defendant:
Morris Friedman, Phyliss Friedman and Self Help Community Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
