Cases 101 - 110 of 337
Jose Miguel Rivas v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation et al
as 2:2017cv08770
Defendant:
Does and National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Plaintiff:
Jose Duran Rivas
James v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak)
as 3:2017cv06645
Plaintiff:
Sheila James
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak)
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Erin A. Galicia v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation et al
as 2:2017cv08020
Defendant:
AMTRAK, Does, National Railroad Passenger Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Erin Galicia
Nevis v. Rideout Memorial Hospital, et al.,
as 2:2017cv02295
Plaintiff:
Joseph Daniel Nevis
Defendant:
Rideout Memorial Hospital, Hector Lopez, National Railroad Passenger Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
L. v. State of California et al
as 3:2017cv06242
Plaintiff:
N. L.
Defendant:
State of California, State of California Department of Transportation aka CALTRANS, The City of Oakland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Deidre Fisher v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
as 2:2017cv07717
Defendant:
Does and National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Plaintiff:
Diedre Fisher
Peggy Rudnick v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation, et al
as 2:2017cv05568
Defendant:
Does and National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Plaintiff:
Peggy Rudnick
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv03891
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
De La Mora v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
as 5:2017cv03673
Plaintiff:
Arlene De La Mora
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Inez Sunta Tarver v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
as 2:2017cv04381
Defendant:
Rudolph Haynes, Pamela Keyes, National Railroad Passenger Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Inez Sunta Tarver
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
