Cases 101 - 110 of 122
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2011cv00910
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Ammar v. Northland Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00731
Plaintiff:
Priscilla Ammar
Defendant:
Northland Group, Inc. and National Grid USA Service Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01403
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
The State of New York v. Martens et al
as 2:2011cv00405
Defendant:
Aero Specialties Mfg. Corp., Ahold U.S.A., Inc., Amacon Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
Joe Martens and The State of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lankes v. National Grid et al
as 1:2010cv00910
Plaintiff:
David Lankes
Defendant:
National Grid, the Vice President of Compensation and Benefits, the Benefits Committee National Grid USA Service Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv06507
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv02835
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Creditor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334 Bankruptcy Appeal
Faccio et al v. National Grid Electric and Gas Company
as 1:2010cv00716
Plaintiff:
Daniel Faccio, Chastity Faccio, D.F. and others
Defendant:
National Grid Electric and Gas Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoops v. KeySpan Energy et al
as 2:2010cv02777
Plaintiff:
Carl Hoops
Defendant:
KeySpan Energy and National Grid
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Marin v. National Grid et al
as 6:2010cv00439
Plaintiff:
Mel M. Marin
Defendant:
National Grid and Mohawk Valley Water Authority
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
