Cases 101 - 110 of 235
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01089
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401
ROBINSON et al v. FARLEY et al
as 1:2015cv00803
Defendant:
BRANDON CARL FARLEY, BABCOCK, THOMAS HILLIGOSS and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL EUGENE ROBINSON and AGNES JOYCE ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBINSON v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
as 1:2015cv00740
Defendant:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BREWER et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2015cv00565
Plaintiff:
JAMES BREWER , MARQUETTE FRAZIER and ARIK SIMS
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA , WILLIAM SMITH, JONATHAN ARMSTEAD and others
Cause Of Action: Petition for Removal- Civil Rights
MCKINZIE v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2015cv00483
Plaintiff:
MELINDA MCKINZIE
Defendant:
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II, MICHELLE LAVAUGHN ROBINSON OBAMA, JAMES B. COMEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00444
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
ROBINSON v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2015cv00100
Plaintiff:
JAMAL B. ROBINSON
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA , SCOTT PINTO , MAURICE CLIFFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ROBINSON v. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE et al
as 1:2014cv02180
Petitioner:
ADRIAN O'NEILL ROBINSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, DIRECTOR OF THE USPTO, MARGARET PEGGY FOCARINO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MURPHY v. CASAVANT et al
as 1:2014cv02165
Plaintiff:
CAROL MURPHY
Defendant:
JANE AND JOHN DOE'S, DONALD MARDEN, JOSHUA ROBBINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
ROBINSON v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
as 1:2014cv01480
Plaintiff:
VICTOR G. ROBINSON
Defendant:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
