Cases 101 - 110 of 211
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv01179
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bourke et al v. San Diego, City of et al
as 3:2014cv01047
Plaintiff:
Ken Bourke and Harland Lee Klutts
Defendant:
San Diego, City of , Michael Richmond , Robert Cervantes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Krinsk v. San Diego, City of et al
as 3:2014cv01025
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Krinsk
Defendant:
San Diego, City of , Kevin Faulconer , Robert Vacchi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00826
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Red Eyed Jacks Sports Bar Inc. v. San Diego, City of et al
as 3:2014cv00823
Defendant:
Shelley Zimmerman, DOES 1-50 and San Diego, City of
Plaintiff:
Red Eyed Jacks Sports Bar Inc. and Red Eyed Jacks Sports Bar Inc. doing business as Cheetah's Nightclub
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 cv Civil Rights
Abdulkarim v. San Diego, City of et al
as 3:2014cv00644
Plaintiff:
Anis Mohammed Abdulkarim
Defendant:
San Diego, City of , San Diego Police Department and Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pease v. City of San Diego et al
as 3:2014cv00638
Plaintiff:
Bryan Pease
Defendant:
San Diego, City of and Elizabeth Maland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hernandez v. Hernandez et al
as 3:2014cv00591
Plaintiff:
Brian Hernandez
Defendant:
Kevin Hernandez , San Diego, City of, Shelley Zimmerman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pringle v. San Diego, City of et al
as 3:2014cv00371
Plaintiff:
Adam Pringle
Defendant:
San Diego, City of , Martin Reinhold , Richard Reichner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00276
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
