Cases 101 - 110 of 377
GREGORY v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2021cv02115
Plaintiff:
CURTIS J. GREGORY, SR.
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
WRIGHT v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2021cv02072
Plaintiff:
DEWAYNE WRIGHT
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
WILLIAMS v. COMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2021cv02005
Plaintiff:
BARBARA A. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
BRANHAM v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2021cv02014
Plaintiff:
IRENE BRANHAM
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
ROUNTREE v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2021cv01992
Plaintiff:
TIMECA ROUNTREE
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
RUSHING v. UNITED STATES SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2021cv01908
Plaintiff:
SHAUN RUSHING
Defendant:
UNITED STATES SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
RUSHING v. UNITED STATES SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2021cv01909
Plaintiff:
SHAUN RUSHING
Defendant:
UNITED STATES SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALLEN v. SAUL
as 1:2021cv01836
Plaintiff:
VOHNTRYCE ALLEN
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
BROOKS v. SAUL
as 1:2021cv01742
Plaintiff:
EBONY BROOKS
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
JARVIS v. SAUL
as 1:2021cv01523
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Plaintiff:
DEREK N. JARVIS
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
