Cases 101 - 110 of 149
BRANDYWINE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, LLC v. QUIGLEY et al
as 2:2013cv02865
Plaintiff:
BRANDYWINE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, LLC
Defendant:
STEVEN QUIGLEY and TD BANK, N.A.
Cross_claimant:
TD BANK, N.A.
Cross_defendant:
STEVEN QUIGLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Negotiable Instrument
KING v. TD. BANK, N.A.
as 2:2013cv01870
Plaintiff:
TONY DPHAX KING
Defendant:
TD. BANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
SILBER v. TD BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION et al
as 2:2013cv01082
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN SILBER
Defendant:
TD BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION , U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION and EQUITRUST LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
THE ESTATE OF H. FRED CLARK v. THE TORONTO DOMINION BANK et al
as 2:2012cv06259
Plaintiff:
THE ESTATE OF H. FRED CLARK
Defendant:
THE TORONTO DOMINION BANK , TD BANK, N.A. , T-MOBILE USA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
TRAVALINE v. TD BANK, N.A. et al
as 2:2012cv06148
Plaintiff:
SCOTT JOHN TRAVALINE
Defendant:
TD BANK, N.A. and TRS RECOVERY SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv05054
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
TALIB v. WINFIELD et al
as 2:2012cv03862
Plaintiff:
HASAN ABDULLAH TALIB
Defendant:
ALONZO WINFIELD, KENDRA FARIS and TD BANK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
VANACORE v. VANACORE et al
as 2:2012cv01551
Plaintiff:
BLAIR R. VANACORE
Defendant:
JULIA VANACORE, TODD C.. KELLY, TD BANK, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00130
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
JONES v. TD BANK et al
as 2:2011cv07184
Plaintiff:
IRVING C. JONES
Defendant:
TD BANK and OWENS COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
