Cases 101 - 110 of 4,891
GUPTON v. OBERLANDER
as 2:2023cv02891
Petitioner:
ARTHUR F GUPTON
Respondent:
DEREK F OBERLANDER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MALDONADO v. WALKER et al
as 2:2023cv02850
Petitioner:
ANGEL MALDONADO
Respondent:
TINA WALKER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LEE v. SALAMON et al
as 2:2023cv02797
Petitioner:
PERCY LEE
Respondent:
BOBBI JO SALAMON, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GOODMAN v. WAHL et al
as 2:2023cv02705
Petitioner:
RAFAEL M. GOODMAN
Respondent:
MARK WAHL, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DEMORA v. RIVELLO et al
as 2:2023cv02672
Petitioner:
LOUIS DEMORA and LOUIS GENE DEMORA
Respondent:
JOHN RIVELLO, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BUCKS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DAVIS v. TICE
as 2:2023cv02617
Plaintiff:
GARY DAVIS
Defendant:
ERIC TICE, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SIMMS v. TERRA et al
as 2:2023cv02585
Petitioner:
KHALIL SIMMS
Respondent:
MR. TERRA, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DORSEY v. KLINGENFELTER et al
as 2:2023cv02583
Petitioner:
RONALD DORSEY
Respondent:
SCOTT KLINGENFELTER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PRITCHETT v. GOURLEY et al
as 2:2023cv02490
Petitioner:
ZACKARY PRITCHETT
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT MR. GOURLEY, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FORD v. SUPERINTENDENT OF SCI-FOREST et al.
as 1:2023cv00194
Petitioner:
JAMEL S. FORD
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT AT SCI-FOREST, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
