Cases 101 - 110 of 247
Bruce v. Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) et al
as 1:2015cv01780
Plaintiff:
Antoine Bruce
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) and F. Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Giconi et al
as 1:2015cv01767
Plaintiff:
Charles Harris
Defendant:
R. Giconi, A. Cermak, R. Huddleston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perkins v. Wilcox et al
as 1:2015cv01711
Plaintiff:
Herbert Isaac Perkins
Defendant:
Donald Wilcox, Jessica Seaton, David Allred and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chandler v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2015cv01399
Plaintiff:
Johnny Ray Chandler, Sr.
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and G. Santini
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Buhl v. U.S. Department of Justice et al
as 1:2015cv01179
Plaintiff:
Leroy Buhl
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons, John Dignam and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coates v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2015cv01109
Plaintiff:
Christopher Coates
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Charles E. Samuels, Jr., Jose Santana and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellis v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2015cv01045
Plaintiff:
Damon Ellis
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Charles A Daniels, David K. Allred and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McAllister et al v. Stancil et al
as 1:2015cv00984
Petitioner:
Robert McAllister, Gerald Rising, Jr., Arun Sharma and others
Respondent:
Stancil, R. Derr and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Davis v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2015cv00884
Plaintiff:
Alton Davis
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Interested_party:
Case Manager/Inmate Coordinator
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Palega v. Denham et al
as 1:2015cv00612
Plaintiff:
Ekueta Palega
Defendant:
D. Denham, Federal Bureau of Prison and Presentence Reporter (PSR)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
