Cases 101 - 110 of 143
Dennis v. United Parcel Service Inc.
as 1:2012cv04881
Plaintiff:
Clive Dennis
Defendant:
United Parcel Service Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2012cv05344
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv05344
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv02378
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Indemnity Insurance Company of North America v. UPS Freight et al
as 1:2012cv02591
Plaintiff:
Indemnity Insurance Company of North America
Defendant:
UPS Freight, United Parcel Service, Inc. and UPS Ground Freight, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 11707
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00568
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2011cv06591
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Kekus v. United Parcel Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv05320
Cross Defendant:
BT-NEWYO, LLC, UPS East Region and United Parcel Services, Inc.
Defendant:
BT-NEWYO, LLC, CT Corporation Systems, Standard Demolition Services Incorporated and others
Plaintiff:
Artur Kekus
Cross Claimant:
Standard Demolition Services Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Indemnity Insurance Company of North America v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 1:2011cv06648
Plaintiff:
Indemnity Insurance Company of North America
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bey v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 2:2011cv02993
Plaintiff:
Kheru Ra El Imani Bey
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
