Cases 101 - 110 of 213
SNYDER v. GROUP LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN FOR EMPLOYEES OF WAL-MART, STORES, INC.
as 1:2013cv00368
Defendant:
GROUP LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN FOR EMPLOYEES OF WAL-MART, STORES, INC.
Plaintiff:
RITA SNYDER
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
MILLER v. WAL-MART STORES, INC.
as 4:2013cv00032
Plaintiff:
TECCA MILLER
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Durr v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc
as 4:2012cv00057
Plaintiff:
Douglas Durr
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Wilson v. Walmart, et al.
as 1:2012cv00394
Plaintiff:
Arthur Wilson
Defendant:
Walmart , Wal-Mart Stores East LP , Wal-Mart Stores East Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
BYRD et al v. WAL-MART STORES, INC. et al
as 4:2012cv00130
Plaintiff:
AMY BYRD and TONY W. BYRD
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP and WAL-MART STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
JOHNSON v. WAL-MART STORES, INC.
as 4:2012cv00122
Plaintiff:
EVELYN JOHNSON
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00326
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01266
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
DAJANI v. WAL-MART STORES, INC.
as 1:2012cv01273
Plaintiff:
AMAL DAJANI
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
