Cases 101 - 110 of 39,623
Ramos v. Fayette County Jail (Detention Center)
as 3:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Alexis Ramos
Defendant:
Fayette County Jail (Detention Center)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TOLES v. NEWSOME et al
as 7:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
QUONTERIOUS TOLES
Defendant:
LT NEWSOME and CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MOODY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00058
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
TERRELL v. WHATLEY et al
as 1:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
WILLIE JAMES TERRELL, JR
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER TABATHA WHATLEY, WARDEN BENJAMIN FORD, TARMARSHE SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. MCDANIEL et al
as 5:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
ORLANDO SMITH
Defendant:
DEPUTY WARDEN MCDANIEL, DEPUTY WARDEN JONES, FULLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edison v. Thomas
as 1:2024cv01800
Petitioner:
Jermaine A Edison
Respondent:
A Thomas, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Turner v. Sales
as 1:2024cv01795
Petitioner:
Michael Renaldo Turner
Respondent:
Timothy Sales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bailey v. Willis et al
as 1:2024cv01166
Plaintiff:
Patrick Bailey
Defendant:
Fani Willis, Melynee Leftridge and Kristin Howell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HENDERSON v. BERNARD et al
as 4:2024cv00056
Plaintiff:
TAVERRES HENDERSON
Defendant:
TERRY E BERNARD and GEORGIA BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
