Cases 101 - 110 of 2,761
Graham v. Gilley
as 0:2023cv02036
Petitioner:
William Charles Graham
Respondent:
Warden John Gilley and John Gilley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jenkins v. Segal
as 0:2023cv02404
Plaintiff:
Betty Lee Jenkins
Defendant:
Warden Michael Segal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Friday v. Segal
as 0:2023cv02227
Petitioner:
Cleone Cecelia Friday
Respondent:
Michael Segal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Brown v. Halvorson
as 0:2023cv01998
Petitioner:
Remona Lysa Brown
Respondent:
Kathy Halvorson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McIntosh v. Rardin
as 0:2023cv02009
Petitioner:
Patrick Randell McIntosh
Respondent:
Warden Jared Rardin and Jared Rardin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jones v. Segal
as 0:2023cv01825
Petitioner:
Danielle Devona Jones
Respondent:
Warden Segal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Dillard v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2023cv02383
Petitioner:
Freddie L. Dillard
Respondent:
State of Minnesota and Commissioner of Correction
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Dixon v. Beltz et al
as 0:2023cv01931
Petitioner:
Nikita Dixon
Respondent:
Tracy Beltz, Department of Corrections and Commissioner Paul Schnell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gaines v. Rardin
as 0:2023cv01913
Petitioner:
Dwain Gaines
Respondent:
J. Rardin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ware v. Warden, MCF Rush City
as 0:2023cv01918
Petitioner:
Marion Q Ware
Respondent:
Warden, MCF Rush City
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.