Cases 101 - 110 of 10,043
Lane v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2024cv00056
Plaintiff:
John Joseph Lane
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hutchings v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2024cv00119
Plaintiff:
Donald Dean Hutchings, Jr.
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Stafford v. Scott et al
as 6:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Randy Stafford
Defendant:
Adrian Scott and Downing Transportation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Sanchez v. Jacob et al
as 6:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
Felipa D. Sanchez
Defendant:
Ryan P. Jacob, Williams Sausage Co. Inc. and Tyson Foods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Rose v. Koch et al
as 6:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
Tevian Rose
Defendant:
Kelli Koch and LPL Financial, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Jones v. Redbird Medical
as 6:2024cv00113
Plaintiff:
Paul Jones
Defendant:
Redbird Medical
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beviacqua v. Mickeys & Kirbys LP et al
as 6:2024cv00114
Plaintiff:
Justin Beviacqua
Defendant:
Mickeys & Kirbys LP and MK General Partner LLC doing business as Kirby's Prime Steakhouse doing business as Mickey Mantle's Steakhouse
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Pearce v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
Phillip Wayne Pearce
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Kane v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
as 6:2024cv00118
Plaintiff:
Tammy Kane
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP doing business as Walmart Store #374
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
