Cases 101 - 110 of 2,134
Kelly v. Shelby County Conservation Board, et al
as 1:2023cv00019
Plaintiff:
Stephen P. Kelly
Defendant:
Shelby County Conservation Board and Nick Preston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cameron v. City of Des Moines et al
as 4:2023cv00280
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Cameron
Defendant:
City of Des Moines, Dana Wingert, Dao Meunsaveng and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 vp Violation of Due Process and Equal Protection
Tyler v. Ankeny Towing et al
as 4:2023cv00274
Plaintiff:
Billy Roy Tyler
Defendant:
Ankeny Towing and Polk County Clerk of Courts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00018
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Curtis v. Middagh et al
as 3:2023cv00047
Plaintiff:
Cody Curtis
Defendant:
Middagh, G Hazelett, Alber Dabit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 vp Violation of Due Process and Equal Protection
Quick v. City of Newton, Iowa et al
as 4:2023cv00258
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Allen Quick
Defendant:
City of Newton, Iowa, Rob Burdess, Nathan Winters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 vp Violation of Due Process and Equal Protection
Walton v. National Biscuit Flatts LLC et al
as 4:2023cv00257
Plaintiff:
Damen Walton
Defendant:
National Biscuit Flatts LLC, Polk County Jail and Des Moines Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00017
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cr Fed. Question: Civil Rights (Race Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00045
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Emrit v. Jules
as 4:2023cv00231
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Sabine Aisha Jules
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
