Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Missouri
Cases 101 - 110 of 20,699
Criner v. Adams et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2024cv00416
Plaintiff: Phillip Criner
Defendant: Richard Adams, Samuel Snyder and CO I John Doe Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Avery v. Sheriff Birk et al
as 2:2024cv04040
Plaintiff: Robert Avery
Defendant: Sheriff Birk and Steve Hiate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chambers v. St. Louis County et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2024cv00417
Plaintiff: Vincel Chambers
Defendant: St. Louis County, 21st Judicial Circuit Court and Wesley Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelson v. Richards
as 5:2024cv06046
Plaintiff: Ashley Nelson
Defendant: Todd Richards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Naylor v. Judge Wagner, et al
as 5:2024cv06047
Plaintiff: Aaron L Naylor
Defendant: Judge Wagner, Missouri Department of Corrections, Crossroads Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jendro v. Buckner
as 3:2024cv05020
Petitioner: Jeffrey D Jendro
Respondent: Michele Buckner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wade v. USA
as 1:2024cv00050
Petitioner: Kyle T. Wade
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Wright v. Harris
as 4:2024cv00397
Plaintiff: Pete Wright
Defendant: Lane Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hawkins v. Brewer
as 5:2024cv06038
Petitioner: Frank Hawkins
Respondent: Chris Brewer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Marron v. Buckner
as 4:2024cv00196
Petitioner: Vicente Roldan Marron
Respondent: Michele Buckner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?