Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in North Dakota
Cases 101 - 110 of 1,229
Benter v. Nelson et al
as 1:2022cv00169
Plaintiff: Dean Benter
Defendant: Jana Nelson, Deb Houdek, M. Hundley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benter v. Rufu et al
as 3:2022cv00173
Plaintiff: Dean Benter
Defendant: S. Rufu, Sgt. Drechsel and Corporal Pestel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. USA
as 3:2022cv00175
Petitioner: David Michael Davis
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Baggett v. USA
as 1:2022cv00165
Petitioner: Ethan Allan Baggett
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Bridges v. Director of the North Dakota Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
as 1:2022cv00163
Petitioner: John Clark Bridges
Respondent: Director of the North Dakota Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harris v. USA
as 3:2022cv00178
Petitioner: Jovan Marquis Harris
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Howard v. USA
as 1:2022cv00160
Petitioner: Lonnie Alonzo Howard
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Chappell v. USA
as 1:2022cv00159
Petitioner: Jack Albert Chappell
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Oien v. Pringle
as 3:2022cv00157
Petitioner: Jason Wayne Oien
Respondent: Chad Pringle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cavanaugh v. United States of America
as 3:2022cv00152
Petitioner: Paul Henry Cavanaugh
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?