Cases 111 - 120 of 44,597
Savage v. Watson et al
as 3:2024cv01108
Plaintiff:
James A. Savage
Defendant:
Richard Watson, Tammy Grimes, Sgt. Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crayton v. People of Illinois
as 1:2024cv01153
Petitioner:
Keimon Crayton
Respondent:
People of Illinois
Not Yet Classified:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carr v. Arbanal et al
as 2:2024cv02081
Plaintiff:
Otis Carr
Defendant:
. Arbanal, . Wilham, Douglas County Illinois and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erdmann v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv01151
Plaintiff:
Diane Renee Erdmann
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Smith v. Webb et al
as 1:2024cv01152
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey L Smith
Defendant:
Jon Webb, Jeffrey Standard and Ryan Maride
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Attaway v. Bracken et al
as 3:2024cv01079
Plaintiff:
Micheal Attaway
Defendant:
Brittany Bracken and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Attaway v. Doe
as 3:2024cv01081
Plaintiff:
Micheal Attaway
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Attaway v. Galloway et al
as 3:2024cv01080
Plaintiff:
Micheal N.B. Attaway
Defendant:
Darren Galloway, Mrs. Walker, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morgan v. Edens et al
as 1:2024cv01144
Plaintiff:
Juhnell Morgan
Defendant:
. Edens, . Burle, Donald Doolin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Njus v. Warden McClean County Detention Center
as 1:2024cv01154
Petitioner:
Joel Njus
Respondent:
Warden McClean County Detention Center
Not Yet Classified:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
