Cases 111 - 120 of 2,501
Luginbyhl v. Rankins
as 4:2023cv00279
Petitioner:
Levi McRae Luginbyhl
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma and William Chris Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lolar v. State of Oklahoma
as 4:2023cv00269
Petitioner:
Marcus E Lolar
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Savage v. Tulsa County Sheriffs Office et al
as 4:2023cv00266
Plaintiff:
Marquice Donnell Savage
Defendant:
Tulsa County Sheriffs Office, Vic Rigilado, Dobbertin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hogan v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 4:2023cv00260
Plaintiff:
Marquilion Hogan
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma, Board of County Comm'rs of Tulsa County, Ashley Nix and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Swab et al
as 4:2023cv00261
Plaintiff:
Ollie Dewayne Harris, Jr
Defendant:
Brett Swab and Steve Kunzweiler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Barteaux
as 4:2023cv00242
Petitioner:
Daniel Lee Mitchell
Respondent:
Cherokee Nation
Defendant:
T Luke Barteaux
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Coyazo v. USA
as 4:2023cv00240
Petitioner:
Rudolpho Coyazo, Jr
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Jordan v. Brown
as 4:2023cv00233
Petitioner:
Orlando Jordan
Respondent:
Warden Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Malone v. Regalado et al
as 4:2023cv00230
Plaintiff:
Carlos C. Malone and Carlos C Malone
Defendant:
Sheriff Vic Regalado, Tulsa County Sheriffs Office, Undersheriff George Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barnett v. Bridges et al
as 4:2023cv00232
Plaintiff:
Christopher J. Barnett and Christopher J Barnett
Defendant:
Carrie Bridges, Capt. Charles Phillips, Tracie Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
