Cases 111 - 120 of 785
MURRAY v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv08919
Plaintiff:
AMANDA M. MURRAY
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 1:2016cv08868
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND JACKSON
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and DAVID OWENS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LITTLES v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 1:2016cv08888
Plaintiff:
RUDOLPH LITTLES
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, BRANDON HOPPS and WILLY FURNELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 1:2016cv08867
Plaintiff:
TARON BAILEY
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, DAVID OWENS and FREEHOLDERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CARTER v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv08822
Plaintiff:
JOHNEL CARTER
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
IBBEKEN v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv08818
Plaintiff:
ALEX IBBEKEN
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GIBSON v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv08814
Plaintiff:
GREGORY GIBSON
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THILO v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv08821
Plaintiff:
CHARLES H. THILO
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv08820
Plaintiff:
OSCAR WILLIAMS, JR.
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COOPER v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv08813
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND HURK COOPER
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
