Cases
Cases 111 - 120 of 182
Page v. Sexton We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv00215
Petitioner: Shavone Page
Respondent: David Sexton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Douglas Young v. David Sexton
as 13-5384
Petitioner - Appellant: DOUGLAS WAYNE YOUNG
Respondent - Appellee: DAVID SEXTON, Warden
Donald Wallace v. David Sexton We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-5331
Petitioner - Appellant: DONALD WALLACE
Respondent - Appellee: DAVID SEXTON
David Avery v. William Haslam, et al
as 13-5201
Plaintiff - Appellant: DAVID AVERY
Defendant - Appellee: WILLIAM HASLAM, DERRICK SCHOFIELD, DAVID SEXTON and others
Shabazz v. Schofield et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv00091
Plaintiff: Fred E. Dean
Defendant: Derrick Schofield, Catherine Posey, Jim Thrasher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Denton v. Sexton
as 2:2013cv00027
Petitioner: Timothy Lynn Denton
Respondent: David Sexton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Sexton We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv02031
Petitioner: Theron Davis
Respondent: David Sexton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kirkman v. Sexton We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00028
Petitioner: Drew David Kirkman
Respondent: David Sexton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kirkman v. Sexton
as 2:2012cv00488
Petitioner: Drew David Kirkman
Respondent: David Sexton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilson v. Sexton
as 2:2012cv00477
Petitioner: Daniel Wade Wilson
Respondent: David Sexton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?