Cases 111 - 120 of 853
LANE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv20834
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK LANE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
LANE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv20844
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MICHAEL LANE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
LANE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv19869
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER J LANE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lugo-Fernandez v. Quinn et al
as 1:2022cv23251
Plaintiff:
Arnaldo Lugo-Fernandez
Defendant:
Ronnie Quinn, Glen Corbin, N. Pollack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
SHEPARD v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv19319
Plaintiff:
EMORY LANE SHEPARD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
LANE v. PISTROL
as 5:2022cv00189
Petitioner:
ANTHONY JAMES LANE
Respondent:
KEVIN PISTROL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Himes v. St Petersburg Kennel Club Inc
as 8:2022cv02077
Plaintiff:
James Himes
Defendant:
St Petersburg Kennel Club Inc a Florida Profit Corporation doing business as Derby Lane
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Moore v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2022cv00977
Plaintiff:
David Lee Moore and Tugaya Shabaka
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections, Corporation Partner and Parent Company Centurion, Ricky D. Dixon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lane et al v. Security National Mortgage Company et al
as 2:2022cv00565
Plaintiff:
Marvin Lane and Shanita Lane
Defendant:
Security National Mortgage Company, Tamara Perrin and Lisa Casanova
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Earll v. St. Lucie County Jail
as 2:2022cv14311
Plaintiff:
Justin Lane Earll
Defendant:
St. Lucie County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
