Cases 111 - 120 of 523
Anders v. Benson et al
as 4:2020cv11991
Defendant:
Jennifer Redmond, Cathy M. Garrett, Wayne County Board of Canvassers and others
Plaintiff:
Shane Anders, Leigh Reed-Pratt, Venias Jordan, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv63862
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis et al v. Wayne County Election Commission et al
as 2:2020cv11819
Defendant:
Janice Winfrey, Cathy M. Garrett, Detroit Election Commission and others
Plaintiff:
Venias Jordan, Jr. and Robert Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Schmidt, et al
as 20-3120
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFFREY EASTER, Sheriff of Sedgwick County, Kansas and DEREK SCHMIDT, Attorney General for the State of Kansas
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT DAVIS
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv35773
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
John DavisIn re: John Davis
as 20-1591
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
In re: JOHN ROBERT DAVIS
John Davis v. USA
as 20-1508
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DAVIS
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv11131
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv97775
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv90971
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ERIC ROBERT DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
