Cases 111 - 120 of 147
Ramirez-Tolentino v. Woodbury et al
as 1:2012cv00180
Plaintiff:
Juan Manuel Ramirez-Tolentino
Defendant:
Aaron H. Woodbury, Aaron (I) H. Woodbury and City of Aurora
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramos-Hernandez v. Popular, Inc. et al.
as 1:2011cv02785
Plaintiff:
Leonardo Ramos-Hernandez
Defendant:
Housing Financing Authority, Popular, Inc., William (I) Miranda-Torres and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv02144
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Martinez et al v. Nash Finch Company
as 1:2011cv02092
Plaintiff:
Margaret Martinez , Maria Elena Castonon , Jorge Dominguez Ramirez and others
Defendant:
Nash Finch Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01845
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01457
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Imeson v. Colorado 5th Judicial District Attorney's Office et al
as 1:2011cv01371
Plaintiff:
Christopher P. Imeson
Defendant:
Colorado 5th Judicial District Attorney's Office, Mark Hurlbert , Mark (I) Hurlbert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01383
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Chavez v. County of Larimer, Colorado et al
as 1:2011cv00988
Plaintiff:
Martha Chavez
Defendant:
County of Larimer, Colorado, Larimer County Detention Center, Larimer County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Havens v. Johnson et al
as 1:2011cv00490
Plaintiff:
Darrell Havens
Defendant:
William (I) Johnson , William Johnson , Marks (I) Mantych and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
