Cases filed in Tennessee
Cases 111 - 120 of 133
Workman et al v. Levy et al
as 3:2007cv00499
Plaintiff: Philip Workman, Philip Workman, Terry Lee Workman and others
Defendant: Bruce Levy, Bruce Levy, Forensic Medical and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Workman v. Bredesen et al
as 3:2007cv00490
Plaintiff: Philip Workman, Philip Workman and Philip Workman
Defendant: Phil Bredesen, George Little, Ricky Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris v. Colson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2007cv01084
Petitioner: Farris Genner Morris
Respondent: Ricky Bell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Settle v. Bell et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2007cv00401
Plaintiff: Mike Settle
Defendant: Ricky Bell and Sandy Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2007cv00346
Petitioner: Michael Anthony Lewis
Respondent: State of Tennessee and Ricky Bell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Turner v. State of Tennessee et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2007cv00348
Petitioner: Terrance L. Turner
Respondent: State of Tennessee and Ricky Bell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Anderson v. Bell
as 2:2007cv02164
Petitioner: Dwayne E. Anderson
Respondent: Ricky Bell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Bell
as 3:2007cv00250
Petitioner: Ronald L. Davis
Respondent: Ricky Bell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Keen v. Bell
as 2:2007cv02099
Petitioner: David Keen and David Keen
Respondent: Ricky Bell and Ricky Bell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Haynie v. Bell et al
as 3:2007mc00021
Plaintiff: George T. Haynie, Jr.
Defendant: Ricky Bell, George Little and Ricky Headley

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?