Cases 111 - 120 of 252
Wilson v. Houston et al
as 8:2011cv00193
Defendant:
Fred Britten, Robert Houston, Jordan and others
Plaintiff:
Olando Lamar Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Golka v. Houston
as 4:2011cv03078
Petitioner:
Jason L. Golka
Respondent:
Robert Houston
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Herbert Campbell v. Robert Houston, et al
as 11-1743
Petitioner:
Herbert Lee Campbell
Respondent:
Robert Houston and Fred Britten, Warden
Steven Jacob v. Robert Houston
as 11-1663
Petitioner - Appellant:
Steven M. Jacob
Respondent - Appellee:
Robert Houston
Russell v. Sabatka-Rine et al
as 4:2011cv03036
Defendant:
Douglas Diltz, James Dunn, George Green and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick Ronald Russell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bong Chae v. Robert Houston
as 11-1586
Petitioner - Appellant:
Bong H. Chae
Respondent - Appellee:
Robert Houston, Director of Dept. of Correctional Services
Pitzer v. Houston et al
as 4:2011cv03028
Respondent:
Dennis Bakewell and Robert Houston
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Petitioner:
Matthew J. Pitzer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Benish v. Houston
as 4:2010cv03241
Petitioner:
Richard L. Benish
Respondent:
Robert Houston
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas Nesbitt v. Robert Houston
as 10-3522
Petitioner - Appellant:
Thomas Edward Nesbitt
Respondent - Appellee:
Robert Houston, Director, State of Nebraska Department of Correctional Services
John Pieper, Jr. v. Robert Houston
as 10-3519
Petitioner - Appellant:
John W. Pieper, Jr.
Respondent - Appellee:
Robert Houston, Director, Nebraska Department of Corrections
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
