Cases 111 - 120 of 184
Thomas Barton v. Warden, Southern Ohio Correcti
as 12-4003
Petitioner - Appellant:
THOMAS BARTON
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN, SOUTHERN OHIO CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Bruce Wightman v. Warden Southern Ohio Correctio
as 12-3632
Petitioner - Appellant:
BRUCE WRIGHTMAN
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN SOUTHERN OHIO CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
In re: James Sudberry
as 12-3499
Movant:
In re: JAMES SUDBERRY
Respondent:
WARDEN SOUTHERN OHIO CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Wightman v. Warden Southern Ohio Correctional Facility
as 2:2012cv00316
Petitioner:
Bruce Wightman
Respondent:
Warden Southern Ohio Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Marious Sowell v. Warden, Southern Ohio Correcti
as 12-3357
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARIOUS SOWELL
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN, SOUTHERN OHIO CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Doty v. Warden, Southern Ohio Correctional Facility
as 1:2012cv00239
Petitioner:
Ian Doty
Respondent:
Warden, Southern Ohio Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Scott v. Warden, Southern Ohio Correctional Facility
as 1:2012cv00118
Petitioner:
Quinton Scott
Respondent:
Warden, Southern Ohio Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hill v. Warden Southern Ohio Correctional Facility
as 1:2012cv00063
Plaintiff:
Tyrone David Hill
Defendant:
Warden Southern Ohio Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OH Execution Protocol
as 12-3035
:
In re: OHIO EXECUTION PROTOCOL LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
BENNIE ADAMS, et. al.
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CHARLES L. LORRAINE
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN KASICH, Governor, State of Ohio, GARY MOHR, Director, ODRC, DONALD MORGAN, Warden, Southern Ohio Correctional Facility and others
Crowley v. Warden Southern Ohio Correctional Facility
as 3:2011cv00431
Petitioner:
Bryant L. Crowley
Respondent:
Warden Southern Ohio Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
