Cases 111 - 120 of 214
Rowe v. Reisch et al
as 4:2010cv04049
Petitioner:
Michael Wayne Rowe
Respondent:
Tim Reisch, Lightenberg, Weber and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Deloria v. Lightenberg et al
as 4:2010cv04041
Plaintiff:
David Mikal Deloria
Defendant:
Ed Lightenberg, Douglas Weber, South Dakota Bd. of Pardon's and Paroles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gard v. Weber et al
as 5:2010cv05017
Petitioner:
Rex Gard
Respondent:
Douglas Weber and Marty Jackley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shaw v. Weber
as 5:2010cv05018
Petitioner:
James E. Shaw
Respondent:
Douglas Weber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Charging Crow v. Weber et al
as 4:2010cv04024
Plaintiff:
Delbert Charging Crow, Jr.
Defendant:
Douglas Weber, Judy Spurrow, Clifton Fantroy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Songer v. Weber
as 4:2010cv04017
Plaintiff:
Myron L. Songer
Defendant:
Douglas Weber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rowe v. Reisch et al
as 4:2010cv04008
Plaintiff:
Michael W. Rowe
Defendant:
Tim Reisch, Mr. Lightenberg, Mr. Weber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Native American Council of Tribes et al v. Weber et al
as 4:2009cv04182
Plaintiff:
Native American Council of Tribes, Blaine Brings Plenty, Shawn Garrnett and others
Defendant:
Douglas Weber, Timothy Reisch and Marty Jackley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Cody v. Loen et al
as 4:2009cv04169
Plaintiff:
William Cody
Defendant:
Douglas Loen, Derrick Bieber, Dennis Block and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Neuroth v. Weber
as 4:2009cv04167
Petitioner:
Victor Sinclair Neuroth
Defendant:
Douglas L. Weber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
