Cases 111 - 120 of 76,756
Susan Seltzer v. Gary Gensler, et al
as 24-5108
Petitioner:
Susan Seltzer
Respondent:
Gary Gensler, SEC Chairman and Securities and Exchange Commission
Kenneth Alexander v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 24-5109
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Spencer Alexander
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security, International Benefits Unit
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01209
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
CONNER v. LANDRY
as 1:2024cv01208
Plaintiff:
ALBERTUS CONNER, JR.
Defendant:
JEFF LANDRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Columbia Riverkeeper, et al v. FERC
as 24-1096
Petitioner:
Columbia Riverkeeper and Rogue Climate
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
BAILEY v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2024cv01219
Plaintiff:
Pamela BAILEY d/b/a More Than Our Crimes
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
CLEAR BLUE SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY v. Rowe et al
as 1:2024cv01216
Plaintiff:
CLEAR BLUE SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
MICHAEL ROWE, PCHANGE PROTECTIVE SERVICES LLC, VESTA MANAGEMENT DC, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
TWARDY et al v. OCWEN FINANCIAL CORPORATION et al
as 1:2024cv01200
Plaintiff:
FRANCIS TWARDY, CLARENCE E. OWENS, FRANCES ROGERS and others
Defendant:
OCWEN FINANCIAL CORPORATION, OCWEN LOAN SERVICING LLC and PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01218
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
CENTER TO ADVANCE SECURITY IN AMERICA v. U.S. AIR FORCE
as 1:2024cv01210
Plaintiff:
CENTER TO ADVANCE SECURITY IN AMERICA
Defendant:
U.S. AIR FORCE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
