Cases 111 - 120 of 589
Desiderio v. Hudson Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00541
Defendant:
Hudson Technologies, Inc. and Brian Coleman
Plaintiff:
Staryl Desiderio
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2612 FMLA: Leave Requirements
KRIEGER v. Thuro Metal Products, Inc.
as 0:2021cv07043
Plaintiff:
LOUIS KRIEGER
Defendant:
Thuro Metal Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Krieger v. Thuro Metal Products, Inc.
as 2:2021cv07043
Plaintiff:
Louis Krieger
Defendant:
Thuro Metal Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
DiLorenzo v. J. Crew Group, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv10768
Plaintiff:
Maria DiLorenzo
Defendant:
J. Crew Group, LLC, Michael Nicholson and Libby Wadle
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 FMLA: Family and Medical Leave Act (Findings and Purposes)
Hoffman v. Professional Disposables International, Inc.
as 7:2021cv09751
Plaintiff:
Joseph Hoffman
Defendant:
Professional Disposables International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Lopez v. South Nassau Communities Hospital, Inc.
as 1:2021cv06457
Plaintiff:
Ms. Lisa Lopez
Defendant:
South Nassau Communities Hospital, Inc. doing business as Mount Sinai South Nassau
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Gega v. Harold Levinson Associates, LLC
as 2:2021cv06467
Plaintiff:
Leonard Gega
Defendant:
Harold Levinson Associates, LLC
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
GEGA v. Harold Levinson Associates, LLC
as 1:2021cv06467
Plaintiff:
LEONARD GEGA
Defendant:
Harold Levinson Associates, LLC
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Park v. Thornton Tomasetti, Inc.
as 1:2021cv09015
Plaintiff:
Julius Park
Defendant:
Thornton Tomasetti, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Gigante v. Misonix Inc. et. al.
as 2:2021cv06004
Plaintiff:
Joseph Gigante
Defendant:
Misonix Inc., Stavros Vizirgianikis, Sharon Klugewicz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
