Cases 111 - 120 of 426
Jihad Adbul-Mumit v. Alexandria Hyundai, LLC
as 17-1582
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JIHAD ADBUL-MUMIT, MATTHEW ABEDI, MONICA ADAIR SARGENT and others
Defendant - Appellee:
ALEXANDRIA HYUNDAI, LLC, BROWN'S LEESBURG HYUNDAI, LLC, BROWN'S MANASSAS HYUNDAI, LLC and others
Nicole Mizrahi v. National Board of Examiner
as 17-1508
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NICOLE MIZRAHI, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
NATIONAL BOARD OF EXAMINERS IN OPTOMETRY, INC.
William Peterson v. Jack Peterson
as 17-1443
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM JOHN PETERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
JACK RICHARD PETERSON and BEAUMONT COMPANIES, INC.
Defendant:
THOMAS DENNIS PETERSON and THOMAS D. PETERSON, LLC
Josephat Mua v. State of Maryland
as 17-1426
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPHAT MUA and FRANCOISE VANDENPLAS
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF MARYLAND, CALIFORNIA CASUALTY INDEMNITY EXCHANGE and MARSDEN & SELEDEE, LLC
NuCar Connection, Inc. v. Burl Howell
as 17-1355
Plaintiff - Appellee:
NUCAR CONNECTION, INC.
Defendant - Appellant:
BURL ANDERSON HOWELL and ALICE A. HOWELL
Teresa Doherty v. PNC Mortgage
as 17-1350
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERESA DOHERTY
Defendant - Appellee:
PNC MORTGAGE, A Division of PNC Bank, NA
Sabrina Renee Brown v. Value Place
as 17-1310
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SABRINA RENEE BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
VALUE PLACE
Sabrina Renee Brown v. Motel 6
as 17-1311
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SABRINA RENEE BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
MOTEL 6
Katherine B. Robinson v. Chesapeake Bank of Maryland
as 17-1217
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KATHERINE B. ROBINSON and DANA B. WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
CHESAPEAKE BANK OF MARYLAND and PROCTOR FINANCIAL, INC.
Constructure Management, Inc. v. Mukesh Majmudar
as 17-1159
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CONSTRUCTURE MANAGEMENT, INC.
Defendant - Appellant:
MUKESH MAJMUDAR, HOPKINS HOSPITALITY INVESTORS, LLC and HOPKINS INVESTORS, LLC
Defendant:
STAR DEVELOPMENT GROUP, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
