Cases 111 - 120 of 77,177
MONTGOMERY v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 3:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
JOHN W MONTGOMERY
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA and SECRETARY FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MATHEWS v. STREEIT et al
as 3:2024cv00167
Plaintiff:
CARLTON XAVIER MATHEWS
Defendant:
J STREEIT and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. KING et al
as 4:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
JESSIE W JONES and JESSIE WIMSY JONES
Defendant:
JOSHEPH J BIDEN, WAKULLA ANNEX CORRECTION INSTITUTION SHIFT SUPERVISOR, SGT DICKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Withers et al
as 5:2024cv00192
Plaintiff:
George Clark
Defendant:
Shannon Withers and FNU George
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Ross v. Finkle et al
as 8:2024cv00915
Plaintiff:
Arthur Lee Ross
Defendant:
Brandon L. Finkle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Lane et al
as 3:2024cv00376
Plaintiff:
Freddie J. Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Lane, Hale, Lance Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Orso v. Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office
as 9:2024cv80237
Plaintiff:
Grady Jerone Orso
Defendant:
Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office, Rick L Bradshaw, Palm Beach County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Taylor v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 2:2024cv00183
Petitioner:
Leonard Wayne Taylor
Respondent:
Ricky Dixon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PRIESTER v. HARRIS et al
as 3:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
DAVID PRIESTER, JAMES THOMAS and DAVID JACKSON
Defendant:
SCOTT S HARRIS, GRANT MALOY, EUGENE GRINBERG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Remaley v. United States of America
as 6:2024cv00735
Petitioner:
Michael Remaley
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
