Cases 111 - 120 of 44,652
Jackson v. Jones
as 1:2024cv01657
Petitioner:
Sr. Lawrence L Jackson
Respondent:
Illinois River Correctional Center and Chance Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Drago v. Chime Financial Technology Company
as 3:2024cv03046
Plaintiff:
James Drago
Defendant:
Chime Financial Technology Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fernandez v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv01769
Plaintiff:
George A Fernandez
Defendant:
Tom Dart, Cook County Jail Director, Hollis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mannie v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv50160
Plaintiff:
Markus Mannie
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Andrea Tack, Jacob J. Long and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brexton v. Shawnee Correctional Center et al
as 3:2024cv01178
Plaintiff:
James Brexton
Defendant:
Shawnee Correctional Center and Darren D. Galloway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Farner v. Redmond et al
as 3:2024cv50159
Plaintiff:
Joshua Farner
Defendant:
Robert Redmond, Justin Egler, Major Fernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sweet v. Williams et al
as 1:2024cv03306
Plaintiff:
Derek I. Sweet
Defendant:
Latanya Williams, Lola, Stateville Medical Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jenkins v. Kim et al
as 1:2024cv03310
Plaintiff:
William J. Jenkins
Defendant:
Young Kim, Donna Petrauskis, Wellpath LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell v. Mayor of Robbins Illinois et al
as 1:2024cv02097
Plaintiff:
David Campbell
Defendant:
Mayor of Robbins Illinois, Chief of Police and Sharon Dyson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01758
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
