Cases 111 - 120 of 11,849
Jackson, III v. Warden
as 2:2024cv00010
Petitioner:
David Edward Jackson, III
Defendant:
Warden
Respondent:
Indiana Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PIRANT v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2023cv02290
Petitioner:
JAMIL M. PIRANT
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SPICER v. WARDEN
as 2:2023cv00582
Petitioner:
HARRY SPICER
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Peacher v. Warden
as 3:2023cv01106
Petitioner:
Robert Peacher and R Peacher
Respondent:
Warden
Not Yet Classified:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only) and WABASH VALLEY E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WARD v. WARDEN
as 2:2024cv00012
Petitioner:
TORY D. WARD
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CHANCELLOR v. KALLIS et al
as 2:2024cv00015
Petitioner:
KIMBERLY CHANCELLOR
Respondent:
STEVE KALLIS and UNITED STATES OF AMERICAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
SMITH v. RULE
as 2:2023cv00580
Petitioner:
NICKOLAS SMITH
Respondent:
T. RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
CLARK v. RULE
as 2:2024cv00003
Petitioner:
IZIAH CLARK
Respondent:
T. RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
SHUMPERT v. WARDEN
as 2:2024cv00040
Petitioner:
REGINALD L. SHUMPERT
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Burrus v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
Ronnie D Burrus
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
