Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in North Dakota
Cases 111 - 120 of 1,226
Longtail v. Larocque
as 3:2022cv00111
Plaintiff: Gabriel Longtail
Defendant: Officer Stacey Larocque
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holmes v. Pringle
as 3:2022cv00117
Petitioner: Jerry Verl Holmes, Sr.
Respondent: Chad Pringle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ricot v. Mulder Hospitality Group, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00118
Plaintiff: Toussaint Reginald Ricot
Defendant: Mulder Hospitality Group, Inc., Corey J Quinton, Marty Mulder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Atkins v. Pringle
as 3:2022cv00110
Petitioner: Cody Michael Atkins
Respondent: Warden Chad Pringle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carlson v. USA
as 3:2022cv00130
Petitioner: Sarah Ann Carlson
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Johnson v. USA
as 3:2022cv00126
Petitioner: Mardale Deshaun Johnson
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Schuh et al v. Burgum et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00026
Plaintiff: Ricky R. Schuh and Adam S. Hamilton
Defendant: Governor Doug Burgum, Dave Krabbenhoft, James Sayler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Landis v. Krabbenhoft We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00094
Petitioner: Douglas E. Landis
Respondent: David Krabbenhoft
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stiles v. USA
as 3:2022cv00115
Petitioner: Robert Carlton Stiles
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Mitchell v. USA
as 3:2022cv00113
Petitioner: Lornell Centrell Mitchell
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?