Cases 111 - 120 of 32,313
Brooks v. Stoy et al
as 1:2024cv00369
Plaintiff:
Michael Brooks
Defendant:
Stoy, Williams, Officer Unknown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Falso v. Lloyd et al
as 7:2024cv00182
Plaintiff:
Jacob D. Falso
Defendant:
Captain Todd Lloyd, Ms. N. Korinko, Colonel Eric Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00156
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson-Buisson v. Dotson
as 1:2024cv00603
Petitioner:
Jeremy Lee Watson-Buisson and Jeremy Leigh Watson-Buisson
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. West et al
as 3:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
Damian Jackson
Defendant:
Patricia West, Lloyd Banks, Michelle Dermyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Custis v. Accomack County Sheriff's Office, et al.
as 3:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
William Parke Custis
Defendant:
Accomack County Sheriff's Office, Wayne Greer, Donnie Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yeats v. Dotson
as 7:2024cv00263
Petitioner:
Killian Yeats
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas v. Dotson
as 7:2024cv00266
Petitioner:
Timothy James Thomas
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Compton v. S.W.V.R.J.A.
as 7:2024cv00264
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Dean Compton, Jr.
Defendant:
S.W.V.R.J.A.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00650
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
