Cases 111 - 120 of 37,488
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02717
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02721
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Michael Ray Armijo v. Edward Borla
as 8:2024cv00719
Petitioner:
Michael Ray Armijo
Respondent:
Edward Borla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anthony Gooden v. Tracy Johnson
as 2:2024cv02648
Petitioner:
Anthony Gooden
Respondent:
Tracy Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Julio Espinoza Preciado v. Warden
as 2:2024cv02663
Plaintiff:
Julio Espinoza Preciado
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Hung Duong Nguon v. James S. Hill
as 2:2024cv02561
Petitioner:
Hung Duong Nguon
Respondent:
James S. Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Marlow Stalling v. P. Castellano et al
as 2:2024cv01093
Plaintiff:
Marlow Stalling
Defendant:
P. Castellano, E Martinez, S. Palacious and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joe A. Taylor-El et al v. Leanna Lundy et al
as 2:2024cv02611
Plaintiff:
Joe A. Taylor-El and Darrick L. Jones-Bey
Defendant:
Leanna Lundy, Erica Lake, J. McKay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frederick George Roehler v. L. Lundy et al
as 2:2024cv01269
Plaintiff:
Frederick George Roehler, II
Defendant:
L. Lundy, D. Williams, S. Rivera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cedric Garnett Johnson v. Travis Pennington et al
as 5:2024cv00678
Plaintiff:
Cedric Garnett Johnson
Defendant:
Travis Pennington, D. Mortimer, D. Tristan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
