Cases 111 - 120 of 1,026
Young (ID 49196) v. Walsh
as 5:2022cv03231
Plaintiff:
James Harold Young
Defendant:
Robert Walsh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Dodge City Community College
as 5:2022cv03207
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Lewis, Jr.
Defendant:
Dodge City Community College
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maier v. Armbrister et al
as 5:2022cv03236
Plaintiff:
Christopher Coty Maier
Defendant:
Jay Armbrister, Douglas County Sheriff's Office and Scott Schwab
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Suppes v. Stafford, County of
as 5:2022cv03223
Plaintiff:
Adam Eugene Suppes
Defendant:
Stafford, County of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnett v. United States Government et al
as 5:2022cv03239
Plaintiff:
James Barnett
Defendant:
United States Government, Jane Doe, John Doe (1) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Thacher v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 5:2022cv03283
Plaintiff:
Trent M. Thacher
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service and Kansas Department of Revenue
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
McGee (ID 113662) v. Rule
as 5:2022cv03212
Plaintiff:
Antonio Alexander McGee
Defendant:
(fnu) Rule
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lawrence v. Wright
as 5:2022cv03203
Plaintiff:
Shane Richard Lawrence
Defendant:
Travis Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnett (ID 86695) v. Wichita Police Department, City of et al
as 5:2022cv03187
Plaintiff:
Paul Lawrence Barnett
Defendant:
Wichita Police Department, City of, Amy McCowen and Kenneth Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis (ID 116257) v. Dalke et al
as 5:2022cv03204
Plaintiff:
Joel Arthur Davis
Defendant:
Remington Dalke and Audra Asher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
