Cases 111 - 120 of 1,939
ANTHONY v. HOULTON POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2023cv00016
Plaintiff:
JAMES A ANTHONY
Defendant:
HOULTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, TRAVIS SMITH and OFFICER 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
NICHOLAS v. CAMUSO
as 1:2023cv00015
Plaintiff:
JB NICHOLAS
Defendant:
JUDY A CAMUSO
Not Classified By Court:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - NON PRISONER IFP CASES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PIKE et al v. BUDD
as 1:2022cv00360
Plaintiff:
SAMANTHA PIKE and NATASHA IRVING
Defendant:
CHARLES F BUDD, JR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
SCHUSTER v. WILLIAMS
as 1:2022cv00359
Plaintiff:
JOHN SCHUSTER
Defendant:
DANNY WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
WICKHAM v. UNITED STATES
as 2:2023cv00002
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM J WICKHAM
Defendant:
UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PORTER et al v. MAINE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES et al
as 1:2022cv00398
Plaintiff:
JULIE F PORTER and PH T P
Defendant:
MAINE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, JEANNE LAMBREW and MEGHAN SPERRY
Not Classified By Court:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - NON PRISONER IFP CASES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
POOLE v. HANCOCK COUNTY et al
as 1:2022cv00364
Plaintiff:
DOROTHY POOLE
Defendant:
HANCOCK COUNTY, SCOTT KANE, TIMOTHY RICHARDSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00367
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00415
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00339
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
