Cases 111 - 120 of 2,756
Xayamonty v. Thomas et al
as 0:2023cv00726
Petitioner:
Khamsay Zayamonty and Khamsay Xayamonty
Respondent:
Warden Thomas, Mr. Vanhover, BOP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Seamon v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2023cv02025
Petitioner:
Leonard Deron Seamon
Respondent:
State of Minnesota, Minnesota Department of Corrections, Commissioner Paul Schnell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilson v. Rardin et al
as 0:2023cv01653
Petitioner:
Kenneth Wilson
Respondent:
Warden Jared Rardin, Collette Peters and Merrick Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Dupree v. Segal
as 0:2023cv01676
Petitioner:
Linda Sade' Dupree
Respondent:
Michael Segal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Krasky v. Bolin
as 0:2023cv01631
Petitioner:
Edward Richard Krasky
Respondent:
William Bolin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martinez-Vivanco v. Warden
as 0:2023cv01853
Petitioner:
Lucila Martinez-Vivanco
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McIntosh v. Rardin
as 0:2023cv01832
Petitioner:
Patrick Randell McIntosh
Respondent:
Warden Rardin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Favors v. Harpstead
as 0:2023cv01647
Petitioner:
Joseph Anthony Favors
Respondent:
Jodi Harpstead
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Creager v. King
as 0:2023cv01603
Petitioner:
Paul Everett Creager
Respondent:
Warden King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Alcazar v. Bureau of Prisons
as 0:2023cv01996
Petitioner:
Everardo Alcazar
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
