Cases 111 - 120 of 1,133
Maes v. Hometown Food Company
as 3:2022cv00889
Plaintiff:
Damian Maes
Defendant:
Hometown Food Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661 Family Medical Leave Act
Parker v. Grob Systems Inc.
as 3:2022cv00850
Plaintiff:
Adam Parker
Defendant:
Grob Systems Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661 Family Medical Leave Act
De Jesus v. Mancor Ohio, Inc.
as 3:2022cv00138
Plaintiff:
John De Jesus
Defendant:
Mancor Ohio, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617 Family and Medical Leave Act
Muldrow v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
as 2:2021cv04275
Plaintiff:
Desiree Muldrow
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617 Family and Medical Leave Act
Cobbins v. Northern Stamping, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00842
Plaintiff:
William Cobbins
Defendant:
Northern Stamping, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661 Family Medical Leave Act
Royles v. Trihealth, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00260
Defendant:
Trihealth, Inc., Good Samaritan Hospital and The Good Samaritan Hospital of Cincinnati, Ohio
Plaintiff:
Kiana Royles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Stanford v. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority
as 1:2022cv00648
Plaintiff:
Theresa Stanford
Defendant:
Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Longberry v. YUSA Corporation
as 2:2022cv02390
Plaintiff:
Brion Longberry
Defendant:
YUSA Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617 Family and Medical Leave Act
Schott v. Nelson Worldwide, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00205
Plaintiff:
Gwendolyn Schott
Defendant:
Nelson Worldwide, LLC, Nelson Worldwide Holdings, Inc., John "Ozzie&quo Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Jackson v. R&R Tool, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00275
Plaintiff:
Andrew Jackson
Defendant:
R&R Tool, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617 Family and Medical Leave Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
